Difference between revisions of "SMT201 AY2019-20G1 Ex2 Lim Shen Jie"
| Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
== Part 5: Suitable land == | == Part 5: Suitable land == | ||
| − | [[File: LSJ Suitable land.png|800px|thumb|center|Suitable land]] | + | [[File:LSJ Suitable land.png|800px|thumb|center|Suitable land]] |
==== Discussion ==== | ==== Discussion ==== | ||
Revision as of 13:45, 9 November 2019
Contents
Part 1: Standard view of study areas
Description
The cartographic technique used to categorize the schools by their main_level was hue. That is because the main_level attribute is a nominal data. Point symbols are the best for schools because it would be able to pinpoint their exact location.
Sources
1. Master Plan 2014 Land Use 2. School Directory and Information
Part 2: Raster view of the study areas
Description
As the roads were not categorized by their road type, a calculated field was needed to generate the road type for the roads based on the name of the road. The cartographic technique used to categorize the roads by the RD_DESC was hue. That is because the RD_DESC data is nominal. To represent the roads on the map, lines are the best way to pinpoint the exact location of the roads.
Sources
1. Road Section Line from DataMall 2. Master Plan 2014 Land Use
Part 3: Raster view showing the criterion scores of the study areas
Part 4: AHP tables
Description
The number of people that were older than 65 years increased from 2010 to 2018
Part 5: Suitable land
Discussion
Sources
1. Master Plan 2008 Subzone Boundary (No Sea) 2. Master Plan 2014 Subzone Boundary (No Sea) 3. Singapore Residents by Planning Area/Subzone, Age Group and Sex, June 2000 - 2018
