Difference between revisions of "SMT201 AY2019-20G1 EX2 Kok Jim Meng"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
4 | 4 | ||
==Part 3: Map Layouts of Criterion Scores== | ==Part 3: Map Layouts of Criterion Scores== | ||
| − | <!--[[File:Jim | + | <!--[[File:Jim Part3v2.png|800px|center]]--> |
<br> | <br> | ||
Insert | Insert | ||
Revision as of 21:57, 5 November 2019
Contents
Part 1: Map Layouts of Extractions
Target Roads
1
Buildings
2
Target Natural Features
3
Digital Elevation
4
Part 2: Map Layouts of Proximity
Proximity to Target Roads
1
Proximity to Buildings
2
Proximity to Target Natural Features
3
Slope
4
Part 3: Map Layouts of Criterion Scores
Insert
Accessibility Score
1
Health Risk Score
2
Natural Conservation Score
3
Economic Score
4
Part 4: Analytical Hierarchical Process (AHP)
Before computing AHP and to find out the suitability of building Communicable Disease Quarantine Centre, we have to decide criteria relevant to our goal which I have identified and arranged in the hierarchy illustrated in the above figure. This allows the incorporation and accommodation of both qualitative and quantitative criteria for assessing the suitability of building Communicable Disease Quarantine Centre. So, let’s start computing AHP.
Part 5: Suitability Analysis
Based on the weights computed in AHP (which are equal to 1), we use Raster Calculator to calculate the suitability by applying the following formulas:
