Difference between revisions of "SMT201 AY2019-20G2 Ex2 JerryTohvan"
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Part 1: Study Area Map Components == | == Part 1: Study Area Map Components == | ||
− | + | ||
− | |||
[[File:Overview map.jpg|700px|center]] | [[File:Overview map.jpg|700px|center]] | ||
<p class=MsoNormal align=center style='text-align:center;line-height:normal'><span | <p class=MsoNormal align=center style='text-align:center;line-height:normal'><span | ||
Line 11: | Line 10: | ||
mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman";font-variant:small-caps;color:white'><span | mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman";font-variant:small-caps;color:white'><span | ||
style='color:windowtext'>Study Area Map Components</span></span></p> | style='color:windowtext'>Study Area Map Components</span></span></p> | ||
− | <br> | + | <br><br> |
+ | Firstly, the above summarises an overview of the study area and its map components we want to consider in this suitability land analysis for the Communicable Disease Quarantine Centre in Bukit Gombak. | ||
+ | <br><br> | ||
[[File:Map Target Roads.jpg|600px|center]] | [[File:Map Target Roads.jpg|600px|center]] | ||
Line 62: | Line 63: | ||
mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman";font-variant:small-caps;color:white'><span | mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman";font-variant:small-caps;color:white'><span | ||
style='color:windowtext'>Incomplete Waterway Target Inclusion. Applying buffering and merging of polygons in QGIS.</span></span></p> | style='color:windowtext'>Incomplete Waterway Target Inclusion. Applying buffering and merging of polygons in QGIS.</span></span></p> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <br> | ||
+ | <br> | ||
+ | Figure IV shows Bukit Gombak's Natural Features that will be accounted in as an Natural Conservation factor in weighing the location suitability. The Natural features includes forest, park, water, and also waterway(canal, drain, stream). Waterway polygon was merged into the natural features in order to account in medium of disease transmission that could potentially cause disease spreading. We account this as risk factor that needed to be considered. | ||
+ | <br> | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
Line 74: | Line 80: | ||
style='color:windowtext'>Digital Elevation Map</span></span></p> | style='color:windowtext'>Digital Elevation Map</span></span></p> | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
− | |||
− | |||
<br> | <br> | ||
− | + | <br> | |
+ | Figure V shows Bukit Gombak's Elevation Map that will be accounted in as an Economical factor in weighing the location suitability. Most projects will always assess its cost in building. In estimation, slope inclination of about 15 degrees and beyond could add further costs to increase significantly as the risks become greater and the work becomes more difficult to build. | ||
+ | <br> | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
<br> | <br> |
Revision as of 00:29, 4 November 2019
Contents
Part 1: Study Area Map Components
FIGURE I
Study Area Map Components
Firstly, the above summarises an overview of the study area and its map components we want to consider in this suitability land analysis for the Communicable Disease Quarantine Centre in Bukit Gombak.
FIGURE II
Target Road Map
Figure II shows Bukit Gombak's Road Network that will be accounted in as an Accesibility factor in weighing the location suitability.
FIGURE III
Target Building Map
Figure III shows Bukit Gombak's Buildings that will be accounted in as an Health Risk factor in weighing the location suitability. We want the Disease Quarantine Centre to be further away from residential in order to ensure safe-zone. Health Risk factor will be prioritised as for the very fact that a Quarantine Centre exists, to ensure no further disease spreading. Bukit Gombak has mostly residential areas in its'subzone.
FIGURE III
Target Natural Features Map
FIGURE IV
Incomplete Waterway Target Inclusion. Applying buffering and merging of polygons in QGIS.
Figure IV shows Bukit Gombak's Natural Features that will be accounted in as an Natural Conservation factor in weighing the location suitability. The Natural features includes forest, park, water, and also waterway(canal, drain, stream). Waterway polygon was merged into the natural features in order to account in medium of disease transmission that could potentially cause disease spreading. We account this as risk factor that needed to be considered.
FIGURE V
Digital Elevation Map
Figure V shows Bukit Gombak's Elevation Map that will be accounted in as an Economical factor in weighing the location suitability. Most projects will always assess its cost in building. In estimation, slope inclination of about 15 degrees and beyond could add further costs to increase significantly as the risks become greater and the work becomes more difficult to build.
Part 2: Study Area Proximity Maps
FIGURE VI
Accessibility Factor: Road Proximity Map
FIGURE VII
Health Risk Factor: Building Proximity Map
FIGURE VIII
Natural Conservation Factor:: Natural Features Proximity Map
FIGURE IX
Economic Factor: Slope Layer
Criterion Scores for Map Components
FIGURE X
Accesibility Factor: Road Binary & Criteria Score
FIGURE XI
Health Risk Factor: Building Binary & Criteria Score
FIGURE XII
Natural Conservation Factor: Natural Features Binary & Criteria Score
FIGURE XIII
Economical Factor: Slope Binary & Criteria Score
Analytical Hierarchical Process Input Matrix & Approach
FIGURE XIV
SCB Associates' AHP Scoring Framework
FIGURE XV
AHP Scoring Framework for Accounting Factors
FIGURE XVI
AHP Results
FIGURE XVII
Weighing AHP Scores into QGIS Raster Calculator
FIGURE XVIII
Reclassifying Raster Values using SAGA's Plugin for Degrees of Suitability
Recommendation
FIGURE XIX
Suitability Map Overview
FIGURE XX
Qualitative Analysis: Zooming into Possible Region Using Google's Satelitte
FIGURE XXI
Making Recommendation based on Availibity of Land