Difference between revisions of "IS428 AY2019-20T1 Assign Kok Jim Meng Tasks Questions and Answers"
Line 186: | Line 186: | ||
<td style="border: 1px solid #a7a2a2;"> | <td style="border: 1px solid #a7a2a2;"> | ||
[[File:Jim Task2 Image4.png|600px|center]] | [[File:Jim Task2 Image4.png|600px|center]] | ||
+ | </td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <td style="border: 1px solid #a7a2a2;"> | ||
+ | We have picked M-1, M-6, M-26, and M-35 from the Mobile Anomaly and Uncertainty chart as a filter to show the contamination path in the map of the 4 mobile sensors. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Based on the map, the paths are at these regions: | ||
+ | * Palace Hills | ||
+ | * Northwest | ||
+ | * Easton | ||
+ | * Weston | ||
+ | * Downtown | ||
+ | * Old Town | ||
+ | * Southton | ||
+ | * West Parton | ||
+ | * East Parton | ||
+ | * Broadview | ||
+ | * Cheddarford | ||
+ | * Terrapin Springs | ||
+ | |||
+ | Furthermore, as explained earlier in the uncertainty for static sensors, Palace Hills, Southwest, and Cheddarford were also involved. Hence, we assume that earthquake has stroked the above regions and sensors in Palace Hills, Southwest, and Cheddarford are the most uncertain to trust. | ||
+ | </td> | ||
+ | <td style="border: 1px solid #a7a2a2;"> | ||
+ | [[File:Jim Task2 Image5.png|600px|center]] | ||
</td> | </td> | ||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
</table> | </table> |
Revision as of 21:36, 12 October 2019
|
|
|
|
|
Contents
Tasks Questions and Answers
Task 1
Dashboard
The dashboard provides a total of 3 visuals:
1. Map of the Mobile Sensors and Static Sensors throughout the period from 6 April 2020 to 10 April 2020
Map that provides the location of the sensors of their whereabouts since 6 April 2020 to 10 April 2020. Serves as a filter to filter the other charts. Hover to see the sensor id, its radiation value, the location coordinates, and the timestamp in minutes.
2. Radiation Measurement (Maximum) for Mobile Sensors in Minute of the Timestamp
A time-series chart based on minutes by using a sample size of maximum radiation measurement value from 0 to 5000 of the mobile sensors. Marked by colour intensity where light blue is low and dark blue is high. Hover to see the sensor id and its radiation value.
3. Radiation Measurement (Maximum) for Static Sensors in Minute of the Timestamp
A time-series chart based on minutes by using a sample size of maximum radiation measurement value from 0 to 5000 of the static sensors. Hover to see the sensor id and its radiation value.
Task 1 Questions & Answers
Visualize radiation measurements over time from both static and mobile sensors to identify areas where radiation over background is detected. Characterize changes over time. Limit your response to 6 images and 500 words.
Description |
Images |
When the radiation measurement of a sensor has reached a minimum value of 100 CPM, it is at the dangerous radiation level. According to the International Nuclear and Radiological Event Scale, there are 8 classes of radiation classification as follows:
Hence, we will choose “6. Accident with wider consequences”, “7. Serious accident”, and “8. Major accident” to find out where do these radiation classifications are detected as these classifications are range from 100 CPM onwards. In the map, the blue dots indicate the mobile sensors while the orange dots indicate the static sensors. Based on the timeline of April 6 2020 12.37am to April 10 2020 11.59pm, most of the high radiation occur in the north and central part of St Himark such as:
This is most likely that the radioactive contamination has spread from the nuclear plant from Safe Town to its nearby regions. |
|
While selecting M-9 during that timestamp as a filter in the dashboard, sensor M-9 is actually near the nuclear plant in Safe Town. We assume that since that timestamp strikes, the radiation contamination has started to take place as according to the time-series chart. |
|
With the same indication of the radiation classification as mobile sensors’, for the static sensors, only S-15 has the high radiation measurement as the sensor is fixedly placed near the nuclear plant in Safe Town after selecting S-15 in the time-series chart of static sensors as the filter in the dashboard. |
|
When indicating all the radiation classification for the static sensors, as compared to the rest of the static sensors, only S-15 has no value from 8 April 2020 10.06pm and the value has resumed from 10 April 2020 8.45pm onwards. Probably during that period, S-15 is faulty as it is the only static sensor that is placed very near to the nuclear power plant and most likely both earthquake and the plant leakage were occurred during that period. |
Task 2
Dashboard 1
This dashboard answers the first 2 parts of the task and it provides a total of 3 visuals:
1. Contamination Path
Map that provides the location of the sensors of their whereabouts since 6 April 2020 to 10 April 2020 in hours. Hover to see the sensor id and its sensor type, its radiation value, the location coordinates, and the timestamp.
2. Mobile Anomaly and Uncertainty
A time-series line chart using a sample size of maximum radiation measurement value from 0 to 5000 showing the mobile sensors’ id and its maximum radiation measurement. This chart helps to check where is the uncertainty and the anomaly. Hover to see its value and the timestamp. It is used as a filter for the contamination path chart.
3. Static Anomaly and Uncertainty
Similar to Mobile Anomaly and Uncertainty, it is also a time-series line chart using a sample size of maximum radiation measurement value from 0 to 5000 showing the mobile sensors’ id and its maximum radiation measurement. This chart helps to check where is the uncertainty and the anomaly. Hover to see its value and the timestamp. It is used as a filter for the contamination path chart.
Dashboard 2
This dashboard answers the last part of the task and it provides a total of 4 visuals which all of them serve as filters:
1. Map
A map of the sensors’ whereabouts. Hover to see sensor-id and its location coordinates.
2. Time Series (Minutes) of Radiation Measurements by both Mobile and Static Sensors
Time-series line chart showing the effects of happenings in St Himark over the period. Use a sample size of maximum radiation measurement from 0 to 5000. Hover to see the radiation measurement and the timestamp.
3. Mobile Anomaly and Uncertainty
A time-series line chart using a sample size of maximum radiation measurement value from 0 to 5000 showing the mobile sensors’ id and its maximum radiation measurement. This chart helps to check where is the uncertainty and the anomaly. Hover to see its value and the timestamp. It is used as a filter for the contamination path chart.
4. Static Anomaly and Uncertainty
Similar to Mobile Anomaly and Uncertainty, it is also a time-series line chart using a sample size of maximum radiation measurement value from 0 to 5000 showing the mobile sensors’ id and its maximum radiation measurement. This chart helps to check where is the uncertainty and the anomaly. Hover to see its value and the timestamp. It is used as a filter for the contamination path chart.
Task 2 Questions & Answers
Use visual analytics to represent and analyze uncertainty in the measurement of radiation across the city. Limit your responses to 12 images and 1000 words.
1. Compare uncertainty of the static sensors to the mobile sensors. What anomalies can you see? Are there sensors that are too uncertain to trust?
2. Which regions of the city have greater uncertainty of radiation measurement? Use visual analytics to explain your rationale.
Description |
Images |
As discussed in Task 1 while indicating the radiation classification with at least 100 CPM, S-15 has no value from 8 April 2020 10.06pm and the value has resumed from 10 April 2020 8.45pm onwards. This is due to it is fixedly placed very near to the nuclear plant. In this case when all radiation classification takes into account, S-15’s value has stopped at 20 CPM at 10.06pm on 8 April 2020 until when it reaches at 8.54pm on 10 April 2020 the value has risen to 24 CPM. As compared to the rest of static sensors, there are spikes during that period. However, at the point in time of 10.06pm on 8 April 2020, the radiation value of S-1, S-6, S-14 lay low until the morning and afternoon of 9 April 2020. |
|
While selecting the 3 static sensors in the Static Anomaly and Uncertainty chart as the filter, S-1 is placed at Palace Hills, S-6 is placed at Southwest, and S-14 is placed at Cheddarford. We assume that earthquake has stroked in these areas during that period. This will be discussed in later parts of this Task 2. |
|
As for the anomaly of the static sensors, before the earthquake and the leakage period (as labelled in the blue square which also discussed about the uncertainty previously), S-1, S-11, and S-12 have anomalies as the spikes happened at a different period as unlike to the other static sensors where the spikes happened in a fixed period. |
|
In terms of uncertainty for mobile sensors, as there are 50 mobile sensors, I have picked 10 sample mobile sensors (M-1, M-5, M-8, M-12, M-14, M-16, M-17, M-35, M-41, M-50) which seem uncertain. Sensors such as M-1 and M-35, they have a few of spikes before the morning of 8 April 2020 and thereafter their radiation values lay low. As for M-8, M-17, and M-41, their values lay low until the morning of 8 April 2020 when they have spikes of radiation measurements. Lastly, for M-5, M-12, M-14, M-16, and M-50, there are values lay low after the morning of 7 April 2020 and continue to have spikes in the morning of 8 April 2020. From above we can see that the sensors of M-5, M-8, M-12, M-14, M-16, M-17, M-41, and M-50 have spikes after the morning of 8 April 2020. Hence, we will explore more on the uncertainty of M-1, M-35, and a few more sensors that follow the same trend as them. |
|
We have picked M-1, M-6, M-26, and M-35 from the Mobile Anomaly and Uncertainty chart as a filter to show the contamination path in the map of the 4 mobile sensors. Based on the map, the paths are at these regions:
Furthermore, as explained earlier in the uncertainty for static sensors, Palace Hills, Southwest, and Cheddarford were also involved. Hence, we assume that earthquake has stroked the above regions and sensors in Palace Hills, Southwest, and Cheddarford are the most uncertain to trust. |