Difference between revisions of "IS428 AY2018-19T1 Chua Sing Rue"

From Visual Analytics for Business Intelligence
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 122: Line 122:
 
<p> [[File:Sensor coverage v2.jpg|800px|center]] </p>
 
<p> [[File:Sensor coverage v2.jpg|800px|center]] </p>
  
As such, readings from sensors may not be representative of Sofia City as a whole. Additionally, the clustering of sensors near the city centre may lead to a upward bias in pollution measures, especially since traffic is typically heavier.
+
As such, readings from sensors may not be representative of Sofia City as a whole. Additionally, the clustering of sensors near the city centre may lead to a upward bias in pollution measures, especially since traffic is typically heavier closer to the city centre.
  
 
=== Sensor Performance ===
 
=== Sensor Performance ===

Revision as of 03:22, 12 November 2018

Problem and Motivation

Task 1: Spatio-temporal Analysis of Official Air Quality

EEA Dataset

Name of Air Quality Station Local ID Data available
Nadezhda
STA-BG0040A
  1. BG_5_9642_2018_timeseries
  2. BG_5_9642_2017_timeseries
  3. BG_5_9642_2016_timeseries
  4. BG_5_9642_2015_timeseries
  5. BG_5_9642_2014_timeseries
  6. BG_5_9642_2013_timeseries
Hipodruma
STA-BG0050A
  1. BG_5_9572_2018_timeseries
  2. BG_5_9572_2017_timeseries
  3. BG_5_9572_2016_timeseries
  4. BG_5_9572_2015_timeseries
  5. BG_5_9572_2014_timeseries
  6. BG_5_9572_2013_timeseries
Druzhba
STA-BG0052A
  1. BG_5_9421_2018_timeseries
  2. BG_5_9421_2017_timeseries
  3. BG_5_9421_2016_timeseries
  4. BG_5_9421_2015_timeseries
  5. BG_5_9421_2014_timeseries
  6. BG_5_9421_2013_timeseries
Orlov Most
STA-BG0054A
  1. BG_5_9484_2015_timeseries
  2. BG_5_9484_2014_timeseries
  3. BG_5_9484_2013_timeseries
IAOS/Pavlovo
STA-BG0073A
  1. BG_5_9616_2018_timeseries
  2. BG_5_9616_2017_timeseries
  3. BG_5_9616_2016_timeseries
  4. BG_5_9616_2015_timeseries
  5. BG_5_9616_2014_timeseries
  6. BG_5_9616_2013_timeseries
Mladost
STA-BG0079A
  1. BG_5_60881_2018_timeseries

Data preparation

Issue 1: The official air quality measurements in the EEA Data folder contains PM10 measurements from air quality stations in Sofia city for the years 2013 to 2018. However, the dataset is not complete. Air quality station Mladost has only 2018 data available. Additionally, air quality station Orlov Most is missing data for the years 2016, 2017 and 2018.

Solution: For the purposes of comparison, air quality station Mladost and Orlov Most will be excluded.

Issue 2: PM10 measurements are reported as an averaged daily value for the years 2013 to 2016, but reported as an averaged hourly value for the years 2017 to 2018.

Solution: When comparing across the periods 2013 to 2016 and 2017 to 2018, the hourly PM10 average values will be recalculated as a daily average in order to get a common basis for comparison. At the same time, averaged hourly PM10 values will still be used to drill down into within-day trends for the more recent information.

Issue 3: For 2017 data, PM10 values for 1 Jan 2017 to 26 Nov 2017 are missing. Additionally, 2018 data is recorded up til September 14 only.

Solution: 2017 and 2018 data should not be used for yearly trends.

Overall trend in Daily Average PM10

1. Time series for Daily Average PM10, 2013 - 2016

Overall trend 2013 to 2016.jpg

2. Time series for Daily Average PM10, Nov 2017 - Sept 2018

Overall trend 2017 to 2018.jpg

Seasonal trend in Daily Average PM10

1. Calendar Heatmap

Calendar Heatmap 2013 to 2016.jpg

Calendar Heatmap 2017 to 2018.jpg

2. Cycle Plot

Cycle Plot for 2013 to 2016.jpg

Intra-day trend in Hourly Average PM10

1. Calendar Heatmap: Within-day trend of Average Hourly PM10 by Month

Calendar Heatmap for Within-day trend.jpg

Task 2: Spatio-temporal Analysis of Citizen Science Air Quality Measurements

Data preparation

Issue 1: The citizen science air quality measurements in the Air Tube Data folder are mapped to unique geohash numbers. However, geohash is not supported by Tableau currently.

Solution: Reverse geocoding to get the longitude and latitude of these stations must be done. Use R package, geohash to decode geohashes into latitude/longitude pairs.

Issue 2: Latitude/longitude pairs through reverse geocoding is simply a reference point, and as such, is not representative as a point location.

Solution: Techniques such as hexagon binning should be used to better represent the stations.

Issue 3: Due to the large number of records, data for 2017 and 2018 are stored in separate files. Additionally, it is not possible to explore the data using Excel as not all records will load.

Solution: Use Python package, pandas to merge both 2017 and 2018 csv files into one.

Issue 4: After connecting the merged file to Tableau, it is clear that the data available covers beyond Sofia City. As such, the dataset must be filtered to include only information from Sofia City.

Citizen Air Quality Stations v2.jpg

Solution: Use the lasso tool in Tableau to select all data points within Sofia City, then include them as members in a set while excluding all other data points.

Stations within Sofia City v3.jpg

Sensor Coverage

As observed, there are fewer sensors closer to the city boundary. On the other hand, there are more sensors closer to the city centre. As such, the sensors appear to be clustered near the city centre, and are not evenly distributed across the entire city. This distribution pattern is similar across 2017 and 2018.

Sensor coverage v2.jpg

As such, readings from sensors may not be representative of Sofia City as a whole. Additionally, the clustering of sensors near the city centre may lead to a upward bias in pollution measures, especially since traffic is typically heavier closer to the city centre.

Sensor Performance

Sensor Operation

Task 3

References

Comments