ISSS608 2017-18 T3 Assign Sudhir Panda conclusion

From Visual Analytics and Applications
Revision as of 14:05, 20 August 2018 by Sudhirp.2015 (talk | contribs)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Real intelligence 1.jpg VAST Challenge 2018

Introduction

Data Prep

Insights

Conclusion

Feedback

The final conclusion for the analysis is yes there have been a spike in certain contamination however without the missing data from 2009 to 2013, we will not be able to infer conclusively that the contaminants did cause the wildlife disappearance. Also there were no data points that showed the effect on the contamination towards the disappearance of the wildlife. there were no data point son the counts of wildlife spotted hence we cannot relate the two incidents. Having said that we can prove certain chemicals can be seen increasing.

https://public.tableau.com/views/Assignment_Q2_SudhirPanda_Final_Story/Story1

https://public.tableau.com/views/Assignment_Q2_SudhirPanda_Final_Story2_DataAnamoly/Story2

https://public.tableau.com/views/Assignment_Q2_SudhirPanda_Final_Story3_WildLifeConcern/Story3

Retrieved from ‘https://wiki.smu.edu.sg/1718t3isss608/index.php?title=ISSS608_2017-18_T3_Assign_Sudhir_Panda_conclusion&oldid=13521’