Difference between revisions of "Group12 Proposal"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Sameerp.2017 (talk | contribs) |
Sameerp.2017 (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 33: | Line 33: | ||
<br/> | <br/> | ||
<!--SUB HEADER --> | <!--SUB HEADER --> | ||
| − | + | ||
<div style="text-align:center; padding-top:25px;"> | <div style="text-align:center; padding-top:25px;"> | ||
| − | <font size = 3.5><span style="font-family:Century Gothic;"> | + | <font size = 3.5><span style="font-family:Century Gothic; background:#FF6666;"> |
PROPOSAL </span></font> | PROPOSAL </span></font> | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | |||
<br/> | <br/> | ||
<!--SUB HEADER --> | <!--SUB HEADER --> | ||
Revision as of 21:10, 15 June 2018
*Have the Nations really progressed ?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PROPOSAL
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contents
Abstract
Comparing data for nations.
Objectives
The main objectives of the project are listed as follows:
• Which nations and how they have progressed?
• Is that enough?
Data Source
• will include later
•
Data Description
Basically, the data
Visualization Tools
• R: shiny, shinydashboard, ggplot2, plotly.
• Tableau
Challenges
• Data has large volume and complex pattern, thus might be difficult to model.
• The combinations of indicators can yield numerous trading strategies. Finding an optimal mix of different strategies is more of an art than a science.
• The stock price is vulnerable to many factors, thus analysis based on historical data may not give an accurate prediction for the future return.
