Difference between revisions of "ISSS608 2017-18 T3 Assign Alejandro Llorens Moreno Visualization"

From Visual Analytics and Applications
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 25: Line 25:
 
<br/>
 
<br/>
  
<font size="5"><font color="#8B4513">'''Viz & Insights'''</font></font>
+
<font size="5"><font color="#8B4513">'''Insights and answers to questions'''</font></font>
  
==The Daily Trends==
+
==Trends: Do you see any trends of possible interest in this investigation? ==
<b>Note: The outliers observed in part 3 were removed for the analysis of long period patterns to avoid misunderstandings.</b>
 
 
<table border='1'>
 
<table border='1'>
 
<tr>
 
<tr>
Line 35: Line 34:
 
</tr>
 
</tr>
 
<tr>
 
<tr>
<td><b> 1. Setting the scene – classification of visitors & the “most scenic path” </b>
+
<td><b> 1. Hight levels of Methylosmoline detected  ” </b>
<br>The visitors were divided into 6 segments based on the types of vehicles they drive and their activities patterns, summarized in Fig 1.A below. The patterns of life analysis will address each segment separately.
+
<br>There’s a sharp increase in Methylosmoline levels in 2016 in both Kohsoom and Somchair. Averages increase sharply in the 4 quarters of 2016. This is of particular concern because it’s the contaminant agent. This requires more investigation. In all samples of Methylosmoline for all quarters the measurement is of 130 approx for Somchair and 50 for Kohsoom. This is considerably higher than the average of 22.32 in Kohsoom and 53.50 in Somchair for the last 3 years.  
  
<br>Fig 1.B shows the most frequently visited paths (by gate categories) for all segments of visitors, in which we noticed the route “general gate-rangerstop-rangerstop-general gate” appeared very frequently. The high visitor volume indicates that most likely this path has most attractions in the reserve.  For easier identification, this route will be addressed as “the most scenic route” in the subsequent analysis.
 
 
</td>
 
</td>
<td>[[File:gyf_updated1_1.png|800px|center]]</td>
+
<td>[[File:Methyl.jpg|500px|center]]</td>
 
</tr>
 
</tr>
 
<tr>
 
<tr>
<td><b>2.Day Campers</b><br>Refer to Fig 2.1, day campers started to enter the reserve at 5am and left the park by 18:00. In terms of camp selection, Fig 2.2 reveals that camp3 and 6 are their most popular choices, possibly because they are located nearer to the entrances. Accessibility could be one of the considerations for the day campers in choosing their campaign locations due to the limited time they have in the park.</td>
+
<td><b>2.Water temperature has been increasing </b><br>Water temperature is cyclical and warmer in the months from June to September (summer). However, in 2016 there’s a higher average water temperature in all locations. To be specific, in 1998 the average water temperature in all locations was 12.95 degrees. While in 2013 is 13.89, in 2014 is 14.79, in 2015 is 14.09 and in 2016 is 14.74 degrees. Global warming and other external causes can obviously affect this measurement, however, it’s worth exploring further..</td>
<td>[[File:gyf_updated2.png|800px|center]]</td>
+
<td>[[File:watertemp2.jpg|500px|center]]</td>
  
 
</tr>
 
</tr>
 
<tr>
 
<tr>
<td><b>3.Extended campers</b>
+
<td><b>3.There's been drastic changes in Sulfates</b>
<br>The day for extended campers started a bit later than day campers, from 6am onwards. The time of exit for them also spread over a longer time range (Fig 3.1). Unlike the day campers, they tend to settle down at the more secluded camp sites like camp 5 and camp 8, to enjoy a quiet night of sleep (Fig 3.2).</td>
+
<br> We can see a clear trend in the years after 2007 until 2012 when the average measurement for Sulphates is lower for all locations. But specifically in Kohsoom , Somchair and Busarakhan.  
<td>[[File:gyf_updated3.png|800px|center]]
+
</td>
 +
<td>[[File:SulfatesAlex2.JPG|500px|center]]
  
 
</tr>
 
</tr>
 
<tr>
 
<tr>
<td><b>4.Rangers</b>
+
<td><b>4.Other chemical changes </b>
<br>The day of rangers started from the ranger base and ends there with their first shift started at 6am and the last shift started at 17pm (Fig 4.2). They travelled by long but fixed paths, the reason could be that they are working on routine shifts (Fig 4.1). There are two typical paths adopted by the rangers, the maintenance path and the patrolling path. The maintenance path passed through various restricted gates, which was normally started at 6am,11am and 14pm. The patrolling path covered the entire reserve, started at regular hour intervals.</td>
+
<br>TLooking at Arsenic, Iron and Aluminium, we can determine there’s a huge release of these heavy metals: Arsenic in 2009 for all locations and specifically in 2010 for Kohsoom. Aluminium in Q2 2009. Iron in Q3 2003. Phosphorus peaks in different locations in 2006, 2009, 2014. This is a clear sign of drastic changes in soil or water. It's worth investigating all chemical changes.
<td>[[File:gyf_updated4.png|800px|center]]
+
 
</tr>
+
</td>
<tr>
+
<td>[[File:Otherchemicals.JPG|500px|center]]
<td><b> 5.Service Trucks </b>
 
<br>The service trucks are axle-4 and above heavy vehicles which moved around the reserve throughout the day. They seemed to be visiting the reserve at fixed hours daily – majority of them reported to the “most scenic path” at 6am and 15-16pm daily (path 1 in Fig 5) while the others revolved along entrance 1->generalgate7->entrance 3 at 10am & 14pm daily. These are probably service or supplies trucks transporting goods in and out of the reserve. </td>
 
<td>[[File:gyf_updated5.png|800px|center]]</td>
 
</tr>
 
<tr>
 
<td><b> 6.Sightseeing coaches </b>
 
<br>The sightseeing coaches brought guests to the reserves throughout the day, without entering into the camp sites. Majority of the visitors were brought to the “most scenic path” from different entrances (path 1 in Fig 6) while the rest were dropped along the camping path (path 2 in Fig 6) which connected camps 3,4,5. Unlike the truck drivers, the sightseeing coaches used entrance 3 instead.</td>
 
<td>[[File:gyf_updated6.png|800px|center]]</td>
 
 
</tr>
 
</tr>
 +
 
</table>
 
</table>
  
==The Longer Period Trends==
+
==Anomalies: What anomalies do you find in the waterway samples dataset? How do these affect your analysis of potential problems to the environment? Is the Hydrology Department collecting sufficient data to understand the comprehensive situation across the Preserve? What changes would you propose to make in the sampling approach to best understand the situation? ==
<b>Note: The outliers observed in part 3 were removed for the analysis of long period patterns to avoid misunderstandings.</b>
 
 
<table>
 
<table>
 
<table border='1'>
 
<table border='1'>
Line 101: Line 92:
 
</table>
 
</table>
  
==The Anomalies==
+
==Causes of concern: do any of your findings cause particular concern for the Pipit or other wildlife? Would you suggest any changes in the sampling strategy to better understand the waterways situation in the Preserve? ==
<b>The Movement Anomaly</b>
 
<br>We first used the “Movement Anomaly” dashboard to discover the anomalies in the visitors’ movements. Each individual movement was represented by a Gantt bar. The Y axis contains all the days in the observation period and X axis shows the hours of the day. Filters allows the users to filter to see the activities at restricted gates, or only the activities by certain type of cars or visitors. Three movement anomalies were observed.
 
[[File:gyf_updated12.png|700px|center]]
 
  
 +
<br>
 
<table>
 
<table>
 
<table border='1'>
 
<table border='1'>
 
<tr>
 
<tr>
<th>Anomalies & Car ID</th>
+
<th> Causes of Concern ID</th>
 
<th>Visualization</th>
 
<th>Visualization</th>
 
</tr>
 
</tr>
 
<tr>
 
<tr>
<td>In 12.1, we filtered away the 2P cars and filtered in only the restricted gates and noticed two types of trespassing behaviours:
+
<td>
<br>a.A group of 6 cars (type 1) entered from entrance 1 trespassing restricted area ranger stop 1 from 10am to 16pm, on 10 July 2015. The sensors at gate2 did not capture any of their activities, most likely they moved to rangerstop1 from the entrance1 directly through the jungles. As discussed earlier on, rangerstop 1 is one of the areas that are frequently maintained by the rangers and floras could be found there. This could be one area where the birds are nesting.  
+
<br>I have created a control chart to represent outliers in 1,2 or 3 standard deviations and show specific outliers in the data. Of particular concern is the contaminant chemical Methylosmoline.  
[[File:gyf_updated13.png|600px|center]]</td>
+
<td>The figure below shows the outliers of 1 standard deviation of Methylosmoline in two locations: Kohsoom and Somchair
<td>The gif below shows the paths adopted by the suspicious vehicles,the restricted gates are colored in red.[[File:gyf_suspicious2.gif|520px|center]]</td>
+
[[File:Concern.JPG|500px|center]]</td>
 
</tr>
 
</tr>
 
<tr>
 
<tr>

Revision as of 09:37, 8 July 2018

Wildlife.jpg VAST Challenge 2017:Mystery at the Wildlife Preserve

Background

Methodology

Answers

Conclusion

 


Insights and answers to questions

Trends: Do you see any trends of possible interest in this investigation?

Patterns Visualization
1. Hight levels of Methylosmoline detected ”


There’s a sharp increase in Methylosmoline levels in 2016 in both Kohsoom and Somchair. Averages increase sharply in the 4 quarters of 2016. This is of particular concern because it’s the contaminant agent. This requires more investigation. In all samples of Methylosmoline for all quarters the measurement is of 130 approx for Somchair and 50 for Kohsoom. This is considerably higher than the average of 22.32 in Kohsoom and 53.50 in Somchair for the last 3 years.

Methyl.jpg
2.Water temperature has been increasing
Water temperature is cyclical and warmer in the months from June to September (summer). However, in 2016 there’s a higher average water temperature in all locations. To be specific, in 1998 the average water temperature in all locations was 12.95 degrees. While in 2013 is 13.89, in 2014 is 14.79, in 2015 is 14.09 and in 2016 is 14.74 degrees. Global warming and other external causes can obviously affect this measurement, however, it’s worth exploring further..
Watertemp2.jpg
3.There's been drastic changes in Sulfates


We can see a clear trend in the years after 2007 until 2012 when the average measurement for Sulphates is lower for all locations. But specifically in Kohsoom , Somchair and Busarakhan.

SulfatesAlex2.JPG
4.Other chemical changes


TLooking at Arsenic, Iron and Aluminium, we can determine there’s a huge release of these heavy metals: Arsenic in 2009 for all locations and specifically in 2010 for Kohsoom. Aluminium in Q2 2009. Iron in Q3 2003. Phosphorus peaks in different locations in 2006, 2009, 2014. This is a clear sign of drastic changes in soil or water. It's worth investigating all chemical changes.

Otherchemicals.JPG

Anomalies: What anomalies do you find in the waterway samples dataset? How do these affect your analysis of potential problems to the environment? Is the Hydrology Department collecting sufficient data to understand the comprehensive situation across the Preserve? What changes would you propose to make in the sampling approach to best understand the situation?

Patterns Visualization
1.Campers
Fig 7 provides the yearly visitor traffic calendar for the campers. The campers visited the reserve more often from May to Aug, possibly because this is the warm period of the year. The highest traffic of campers was observed in July 2015. There is a drastic drop in the campers, especially extended campers, from Q4 2015 onwards, which could be attributed to the colder weather.
2. Rangers Trend


Fig 8 below reveals weekly activity pattern for rangers. In 8.1, the heatmap was configured to show the average stay duration for the rangers at various gates. We noticed the rangers would stay for extended durations at camping 8 (Mondays, 10am to 14pm) as well as gate 2 & rangerstop 1 (Mondays 6am – 11am, Wednesdays 13 – 16pm). The rangers could be doing inspection or maintenance works at this these locations. Looking at the reserve map, we can observe that ranger stop 1 and camping 8 are both located at the “dead ends” of the reserve, with no paths extending beyond them – it is likely that these two locations are surrounded with floras whereby periodic maintenance is required.


In Fig 8.2 we could see the rangers gathered at the rangerbase and gate 8 (which is in close proximity to the ranger base) on Thursdays 14pm. It could be an indication that the weekly ranger meetings were held on Thursdays 14pm at the rangerbase.
3.Service Trucks
Fig 9 below shows the weekly movement pattern for service trucks at various gates. We noticed that there were a higher number of service trucks moved pass the “connecting path” on Thursdays, at two prominent timings: 1am and 16pm. This might be the scheduled delivery/pick up hours for the service trucks.
4. Sightseeing coaches



Lastly, Fig 10 shows the weekly movement pattern for sightseeing coaches. The sightseeing coaches seemed to be bringing the visitors to the reserve on fixed days and hours, as the darker blocks on the heatmap tend to appear in regular intervals. For example, the coaches tend to visit the reserve at below timings:


-Fridays & Sundays 3am
-Thursdays & Sundays 11am
-Sundays 16pm
-Mondays 22 pm

Causes of concern: do any of your findings cause particular concern for the Pipit or other wildlife? Would you suggest any changes in the sampling strategy to better understand the waterways situation in the Preserve?


Causes of Concern ID Visualization


I have created a control chart to represent outliers in 1,2 or 3 standard deviations and show specific outliers in the data. Of particular concern is the contaminant chemical Methylosmoline.

The figure below shows the outliers of 1 standard deviation of Methylosmoline in two locations: Kohsoom and Somchair
Concern.JPG
2.b.4 vehicle entered from entrance 3 trespassing restricted areas (gate5,gate6,rangerstop6,gate3 & ranger stop 3) 23 times from 2am to 5 am, only observed on Tuesdays and Thursdays. The trespassing cars followed almost exactly the same paths. This looks like some planned acts which were only performed under the masks of the dark night. Type 4 vehicles are the heavy trucks; they could be transporting some illegal materials in or out of the preserve repeatedly. The gif below shows the paths adopted by the suspicious vehicles,the restricted gates are colored in red.
In 12.2, we kept only the “extended campers” and included all the gates in the analysis. We noticed some suspicious movements of the extended campers at 0 hours which the rest of the extended campers would not be active at this hour. Interestingly, we noticed all the activity records belong to the car ID 20154519024544-322, which stayed in the preserve for 5 months.


Stay Duration Anomaly
In the “Stay Duration Anomaly” dashboard we introduced two scatter plots for anomaly discovery.

Anomalies & Car ID Visualization
4.Abnormally high number of stops visited with low average duration


• Car-ID 20154519024544-322 visited total 281 stops in the park and stayed in the park from 19th Jun to 5th Oct (Extended camper). The same car ID appeared under observation 4.
• Car-ID 20154112014114-381 visited 98 stops and stayed from 14th Jun to 26th Jul (Extended camper)


5.Abnormally high average duration in the reserve with low number of stops visited


• 20150105060134-242, 20150420100416-232 visited 4 checkpoints but stayed for over one month in the reserve (Extended camper)
6.Hiking or sightseeing visitors with abnormally long stay in the park (they are the same group of visitors observed in 1)


7.Hiking or sightseeing visitors with abnormally long stay in the park, car type4