Difference between revisions of "Group05 Overview"
Yjliu.2017 (talk | contribs) |
Yjliu.2017 (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
</center> | </center> | ||
<!------- End of Main Navigation Bar----> | <!------- End of Main Navigation Bar----> | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
<div style="padding: 17px"> | <div style="padding: 17px"> |
Revision as of 04:40, 10 June 2018
Exploring Inequality’s Geographic Dimension Across Neighbourhoods in Singapore: Its Driving Forces & Touch Points
Amidst the recent debate over growing social inequality in Singapore such as the distinct clustering of elite schools and varying access to resources, the dangers of hardening social mobility can pose as a threat for a culturally diverse nation that has upheld its values of social cohesion and racial harmony. In bridging social divide, Singapore has put in place various programmes in the community and schools to nurture shared experiences and promote inter-communities mixing. More recently however, inequality was highlighted to have a geographic dimension even for a densely populated city like Singapore. Using geospatial techniques in R, the dashboard serves to visualise whether geography is an important driver of inequality, by mapping the extent of social inequality and availability of common spaces across neighbourhoods. This will be done in three approaches. Firstly, we will analyse whether there exist clusters that could point towards social inequality and whether this is more pronounced in certain neighbourhoods, based on ethnic mix, age composition, and housing type. This will be done using spatial points pattern analysis including distance-based and density-based measures. Next, using the Hansen Accessibility Model, we will map out the available touch points within neighbourhoods that could facilitate social mixing, such as the ease of access to common spaces, amenities and opportunities for choice of education. This is because an important aspect of social inequality is having reasonably fair access to different resources. Lastly, we will move into solutioning and explore possible spaces such as vacant state land where upcoming public amenities can be best placed to optimise social class mixing and enhance the Hansen Accessibility Index.
|
Amidst the recent debate over growing social inequality in Singapore such as the distinct clustering of elite schools and varying access to resources, the dangers of hardening social mobility can pose as a threat for a culturally diverse nation that has upheld its values of social cohesion and racial harmony. In bridging social divide, Singapore has put in place various programmes in the community and schools to nurture shared experiences and promote inter-communities mixing. More recently, inequality was highlighted to have a geographic dimension even for a densely populated city like Singapore. Using geospatial techniques in R, we hope to visualise whether geography is an important driver of inequality via a three-pronged approach. |
1. Identifying Demographic Clusters (Spatial Points Pattern Analysis) We will apply kernel density estimation as a density-based point pattern measure for visualisation of our clusters, followed by distance-based measures including the L Function, Quadrat Analysis and K-Nearest Neighbour. We will then apply Complete Spatial Randomness Test using the Monti-Carlo Simulation, Quadrat Test and the Clark Evans Test to test the significance of the clusters, respectively. |
2. Modelling Geographical Accessibility to Amenities & Spaces (Hansen Accessibility Model) We will use the Hansen Accessibility Index – REAT and SpatialAcc measures – to assess the accessibility of residents within each neighbourhood to these public spaces. For amenities that exist segregation of access, such as schools, pre-schools and childcare centres, geographical accessibility will be assessed separately based on its class, that is GEP/SAP vs Mainstream Schools, Government-Subsidised vs Privatised Pre-Schools, as well as Government-Subsidised vs Private Childcare Centres. |
3. Solutioning for Common Spaces to Promote Mixing (K-Nearest Neighbour) Lastly, we will move into solutioning and explore possible spaces, using vacant state land data, where upcoming public amenities can be best placed to optimise social class mixing and enhance the Hansen Accessibility Index. This will be done by first identifying “priority areas” with high density clusters and low Hansen Accessibility Index to common spaces, and then performing K-Nearest Neighbour Analysis based on SLA’s vacant state land plots. |
Our team's datasets are retrieved from https://data.gov.sg
Type |
Format |
Data |
Source URL |
Boundary (Polygon) |
SHP |
OSM Layer (Singapore) |
OpenStreet Map |
Boundary (Polygon) |
SHP |
Master Plan 2014 Subzone Boundary (No Sea) |
https://data.gov.sg/dataset/master-plan-2014-subzone-boundary-no-sea |
Demographics |
CSV |
Estimated Singapore Resident Population in HDB Flats |
https://data.gov.sg/dataset/estimated-resident-population-living-in-hdb-flats |
Demographics |
CSV |
Dwelling Units under HDB's Management, by Town and Flat Type |
https://data.gov.sg/dataset/number-of-residential-units-under-hdb-s-management |
Demographics |
CSV |
Residents by Age Group & Type of Dwelling, Annua |
https://data.gov.sg/dataset/residents-by-age-group-type-of-dwelling-annual |
Demographics |
CSV |
Land Area and Dwelling Units by Town |
https://data.gov.sg/dataset/land-area-and-dwelling-units-by-town |
Demographics |
SHP |
Singapore Residents by Subzone and Type of Dwelling, June 2016 |
https://data.gov.sg/dataset/singapore-residents-by-subzone-and-type-of-dwelling-june-2016 |
Demographics |
SHP |
Singapore Residents by Subzone, Age Group and Sex, June 2016 (Gender) |
https://data.gov.sg/dataset/singapore-residents-by-subzone-age-group-and-sex-june-2016-gender |
Demographics |
SHP |
Resident Population of Other Ethnic Groups by Age Group, Ethnic Group and Sex, 2015 |
|
Amenities |
SHP |
Child Care Centres |
https://data.gov.sg/dataset/child-care-services?resource_id=195b6c5f-c277-4ba9-bcdc-25c264e3ee5c |
Amenities |
SHP |
Pre-Schools |
|
Amenities |
CSV |
Primary Schools |
https://data.gov.sg/dataset/school-directory-and-information |
Amenities |
KML |
CHAS Clinics |
|
Spaces |
KML |
Sports Facilities (SportsSG) |
https://data.gov.sg/dataset/school-directory-and-information |
Spaces |
KML |
Community Clubs (PA) |
|
Spaces |
SHP |
Parks (including playgrounds) |
|
Spaces |
KML |
Community Use Sites (SLA) |
|
Spaces |
KML |
Vacant State Land (SLA) |
https://data.gov.sg/dataset/sla-vacant-state-land-and-properties |
This a ROUGH timeline of our entire project. Milestones indicated are according to IS415 AY1718 Project Wiki Page (Detailed timeline will be updated)
S/N |
Task |
Done by |
Week |
Status |
1 |
Topic Brainstorming |
ALL |
2 & 3 |
Completed ✔ |
2 |
Drafting and refinement of Project Proposal |
ALL |
2 & 3 |
Completed ✔ |
3 |
Consultation with Prof Kam for Feedback on Proposal |
ALL |
4 |
Completed ✔ |
4 |
Finalization of Project Topic and Focus |
ALL |
5 |
Completed ✔ |
5 |
Compilation and Cleaning of Datasets
|
Yuqing Grace |
6 |
Completed ✔ |
6 |
1st Wiki Content Update |
Yuqing |
6 |
Completed ✔ |
7 |
Independent learning of R and R Shiny on DataCamp |
ALL |
6 & 7 |
|
8 |
Consultation with Prof Kam for Feedback on tools for Geospatial Analysis |
ALL |
7 |
|
9 |
2nd Wiki Content Update |
Yuqing |
7 |
|
10 |
Map Development |
Grace Yuanjing |
7 & 8 |
|
11 |
Interface Development |
Yuqing Yuanjing |
7 & 8 |
|
12 |
Consultation with Prof Kam for Feedback on progress/techniques |
ALL |
9 |
|
13 |
Debugging and Analysis of Results |
ALL |
9 |
|
14 |
Consultation with Prof Kam for Feedback on final product |
ALL |
10 |
|
15 |
Creating and Submission of Townhall Poster |
Yuqing |
11 |
|
16 |
Uploading of App on Shinyapps.io (Artefact) |
Yuanjing |
12 |
|
17 |
Finalizing Wiki Page & Research Paper (Deliverables) |
ALL |
13 |
|
18 |
Townhall Poster Presentation / Conference |
ALL |
14 |
The following is a list of tentative tools to be adopted for the project’s scope
• Open Street Map |
We would like to credit the following referenced visualization works adopted in the design of our dashboard.
Centroid-Amenities: An Interactive Visual Analytical Tool for Exploring and Analysing Amenities in Singapore
Authors: Siew Xue Qian Jazreel, Tay Wei Xuan, Sean Koh Jia Ming
https://jazreelsiew.shinyapps.io/AppV2/
We would also like to credit the referenced literature considered in the design of our problem statement.
No |
Title |
Link |
Author |
1 |
Commentary: Inequality has a geographic dimension - between and within neighbourhoods in Singapore |
Leong Chan-Hoong | |
2 |
Lack of social mixing is a symptom of inequality, not a cause |
Teo You Yenn | |
3 |
Class divide: Singapore in danger of becoming academic aristocracy |
Chua Mui Hoong | |
4 |
The Big Read: Social stratification — a poison seeping into S’pore’s housing estates and schools |
Kelly Ng and Toh Ee Ming | |
5 |
COMMENT: Can Singapore's elite circle turn around growing social divide? |
Nicholas Yong | |
6 |
This Is What Inequality Looks Like |
Ethos Books (Publisher) |
Nicholas Yong |