Difference between revisions of "Introduction"

From Visual Analytics and Applications
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Undo revision 7614 by Yanzhang.lu.2017 (talk))
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 12: Line 12:
 
| style="font-family:Century Gothic; font-size:100%; solid #1B338F; background:#2B3856; text-align:center;" width="20%" |  
 
| style="font-family:Century Gothic; font-size:100%; solid #1B338F; background:#2B3856; text-align:center;" width="20%" |  
 
;
 
;
[[Data Preparation| <font color="#FFFFFF">'''DATA PREPARATION'''</font>]]
+
[[Data Preparation| <font color="#FFFFFF">'''DATA PREPARATION AND DASHBOARD DESIGN'''</font>]]
  
 
| style="font-family:Century Gothic; font-size:100%; solid #1B338F; background:#2B3856; text-align:center;" width="20%"|  
 
| style="font-family:Century Gothic; font-size:100%; solid #1B338F; background:#2B3856; text-align:center;" width="20%"|  
 
;
 
;
[[Methodology and Dashboard Design| <font color="#FFFFFF">'''METHODOLOGY AND DASHBOARD DESIGN'''</font>]]
 
  
| style="font-family:Century Gothic; font-size:100%; solid #1B338F; background:#2B3856; text-align:center;" width="20%" |
 
;
 
 
[[Insights| <font color="#FFFFFF">'''OBSERVATION AND INSIGHTS'''</font>]]
 
[[Insights| <font color="#FFFFFF">'''OBSERVATION AND INSIGHTS'''</font>]]
  
 
| style="font-family:Century Gothic; font-size:100%; solid #1B338F; background:#0b3d53; text-align:center;" width="25%" |   
 
| style="font-family:Century Gothic; font-size:100%; solid #1B338F; background:#0b3d53; text-align:center;" width="25%" |   
 +
;
 +
[[CONCLUSION| <font color="#FFFFFF">'''CONCLUSION'''</font>]]
  
 +
| style="font-family:Century Gothic; font-size:100%; solid #1B338F; background:#2B3856; text-align:center;" width="20%" |
 +
;
 
[[Assignment_Dropbox_G1| <font color="#FFFFFF">Back to Dropbox</font>]]
 
[[Assignment_Dropbox_G1| <font color="#FFFFFF">Back to Dropbox</font>]]
 
|  &nbsp;  
 
|  &nbsp;  
 
|}  
 
|}  
 
  
 
<br/>
 
<br/>
Line 41: Line 41:
  
 
<div style=background:#0b3d53 border:#A3BFB1>
 
<div style=background:#0b3d53 border:#A3BFB1>
<font size = 3; color="#FFFFFF">Mini-Challenge 3 Overview</font>     
+
<font size = 3; color="#FFFFFF">Mini-Challenge 2</font>     
 
</div>
 
</div>
  
Mitch Vogel left his work at Mistford College but has not forgotten the Rose-Crested Blue Pipit. Soon after arriving in the small town of Sulev in Northern Europe, Mitch started to see the telltale signs of Methylosmolene damage at the nearby Panteleimon Aviary Sanctuary. Mitch hears from local bird watchers that populations of the Greater Eurasian Red-Throated Pipit have been affected.
+
Last year, the Kasios Furniture Company was implicated in environmental damage to the Boonsong Lekagul Wildlife Preserve for both dumping toxic waste and polluting the air with chemicals from its manufacturing process. But Kasios is not taking these accusations lying down, and they deny any accusation of industrial waste dumping! Kasios’ spokespersons state that there isn’t any ground contamination near the remote ranger station that was suggested by last year’s mini-challenge 1 and 3 participants, and they have inspected that area and found it as pristine as the rest of the preserve.
 
 
Since arriving in Sulev, Mitch also noticed that the local university’s office furniture was built in a nearby EuroKasios factory. Sure enough, EuroKasios is a subsidiary of Kasios International, Inc. – a huge multinational conglomerate that is also the parent company of Kasios Office Furniture back in Mitch’s hometown of Mistford. Mitch is immediately suspicious that EuroKasios is contaminating the aviary Sanctuary and endangering the Greater Eurasian Red-Throated Pipit. Worse yet, Mitch wonders if Kasios International may be contaminating pipit habitats around the world.
 
  
Mitch spends weeks reviewing press coverage of Kasios International and public statements made by the company’s CEO. Many of the articles tout the company’s environmentally friendly practices and even talk about recent scientific research that proves the safety of AGOC-3A, an environmentally friendly replacement for Methylosmolene. Mitch is skeptical that the company has halted production and use of Methylosmolene so he contacts the company and asks to meet with representatives from their environmental compliance divisio.
+
Outraged ornithology professors from Mistford College journeyed out to look over the dumping site themselves and perform soil analyses. They returned to report that the site looked like there had been recent excavation and building activities going on. Boonsong Preserve rangers later confirmed that a new ranger station was being built at that site! Soil samples taken from the site were inconclusive in detecting Methylosmolene (the toxic manufacturing chemical in the suspected dumping) or any other contaminant, as new top soil had been trucked in
  
To his disappointment Mitch is not granted a meeting. Then Mitch receives an anonymous letter from someone who’s willing to help. A fellow pipit lover who works at Kasios International has gathered up a variety of company data and identified a suspicious group within the company. Attached to the letter Mitch receives is a USB drive with phone, email, meeting, and procurement records for Kasios International over the past 2 1/2 years. Mitch wonders if the fate of the Eurasian Pipit lies somewhere in that data. Mitch intends to put this data together to see if the problems with Kasios are much larger than he initially suspected.
+
With a primary piece of evidence against Kasios now gone, investigators will need to take another approach. Professors in the Mistford College Hydrology Department have come forward with several years of water sensor readings from rivers and streams in the preserve. These samples were taken from different locations scattered throughout the area and contain measurements of several chemicals of possible interest, but they have never been analyzed due to lack of funding. Could visual analytics help reveal something in this data that could make up for the soil evidence that was destroyed?
  
 
<div style=background:#0b3d53 border:#A3BFB1>
 
<div style=background:#0b3d53 border:#A3BFB1>
Line 56: Line 54:
 
</div>
 
</div>
  
Your task, as supported by visual analytics that you apply, is to help Mitch determine the organizational structure of the group within Kasios that was referenced by the insider providing Mitch the data. How is it internally connected and is anyone else involved? Use visual analytics to analyze the available data and develop responses to the questions below. Novel visualizations and analysis approaches are especially interesting for this mini-challenge.
+
Your task is to investigate the hydrology data from across the Preserve. You are given a map of the Preserve (with the same base as last year’s challenge), with named sampling sites indicated on the map (the names have local significance, but are just mnemonics for your study) You are also provided with readings from each sampling station over time for several different chemicals and water properties.
  
 
<span style="font-size:16px; font-weight:bold;">Questions:</span>
 
<span style="font-size:16px; font-weight:bold;">Questions:</span>
  
*Using the four large Kasios International data sets, combine the different sources to create a single picture of the company. Characterize changes in the company over time. According to the company’s communications and purchase habits, is the company growing? Limit your responses to 5 images and 500 words.
+
*Characterize the past and most recent situation with respect to chemical contamination in the Boonsong Lekagul waterways. Do you see any trends of possible interest in this investigation?
 
 
*Combine the four data sources for group that the insider has identified as being suspicious and locate the group in the larger dataset. Determine if anyone else appears to be closely associated with this group. Highlight which employees are making suspicious purchases, according to the insider’s data. Limit your responses to 8 images and 500 words.
 
 
 
*Using the combined group of suspected bad actors you created in question 2, show the interactions within the group over time. Limit your responses to 10 images and 1000 words.
 
  
**Characterize the group’s organizational structure and show a full picture of communications within the group.
+
*What anomalies do you find in the waterway samples dataset? How do these affect your analysis of potential problems to the environment? Is the Hydrology Department collecting sufficient data to understand the comprehensive situation across the Preserve? What changes would you propose to make in the sampling approach to best understand the situation?
**Does the group composition change during the course of their activities?
 
**How do the group’s interactions change over time?
 
  
*The insider has provided a list of purchases that might indicate illicit activity elsewhere in the company. Using the structure of the first group noted by the insider as a model can you find any other instances of suspicious activities in the company? Are there other groups that have structure and activity similar to this one? Who are they? Each of the suspicious purchases could be a starting point for your search. Provide examples of up to two other groups you find that appear suspicious and compare their structure with the structure of the first group. The structures should be presented as temporal not just structural (i.e., the sequence of events—A is followed by B one or two days later—will be important). Limit your responses to 10 images and 1200 words
+
*After reviewing the data, do any of your findings cause particular concern for the Pipit or other wildlife? Would you suggest any changes in the sampling strategy to better understand the waterways situation in the Preserve?

Latest revision as of 22:52, 8 July 2018

Pic.jpg VAST Mini Challenge 2 - Like Duck To Water

INTRODUCTION

DATA PREPARATION AND DASHBOARD DESIGN

OBSERVATION AND INSIGHTS

CONCLUSION

Back to Dropbox

 



Overview

Mistford is a mid-size city is located to the southwest of a large nature preserve. The city has a small industrial area with four light-manufacturing endeavors. Mitch Vogel is a post-doc student studying ornithology at Mistford College and has been discovering signs that the number of nesting pairs of the Rose-Crested Blue Pipit, a popular local bird due to its attractive plumage and pleasant songs, is decreasing! The decrease is sufficiently significant that the Pangera Ornithology Conservation Society is sponsoring Mitch to undertake additional studies to identify the possible reasons. Mitch is gaining access to several datasets that may help him in his work, and he has asked you (and your colleagues) as experts in visual analytics to help him analyze these datasets.

Mini-Challenge 2

Last year, the Kasios Furniture Company was implicated in environmental damage to the Boonsong Lekagul Wildlife Preserve for both dumping toxic waste and polluting the air with chemicals from its manufacturing process. But Kasios is not taking these accusations lying down, and they deny any accusation of industrial waste dumping! Kasios’ spokespersons state that there isn’t any ground contamination near the remote ranger station that was suggested by last year’s mini-challenge 1 and 3 participants, and they have inspected that area and found it as pristine as the rest of the preserve.

Outraged ornithology professors from Mistford College journeyed out to look over the dumping site themselves and perform soil analyses. They returned to report that the site looked like there had been recent excavation and building activities going on. Boonsong Preserve rangers later confirmed that a new ranger station was being built at that site! Soil samples taken from the site were inconclusive in detecting Methylosmolene (the toxic manufacturing chemical in the suspected dumping) or any other contaminant, as new top soil had been trucked in

With a primary piece of evidence against Kasios now gone, investigators will need to take another approach. Professors in the Mistford College Hydrology Department have come forward with several years of water sensor readings from rivers and streams in the preserve. These samples were taken from different locations scattered throughout the area and contain measurements of several chemicals of possible interest, but they have never been analyzed due to lack of funding. Could visual analytics help reveal something in this data that could make up for the soil evidence that was destroyed?

Questions

Your task is to investigate the hydrology data from across the Preserve. You are given a map of the Preserve (with the same base as last year’s challenge), with named sampling sites indicated on the map (the names have local significance, but are just mnemonics for your study) You are also provided with readings from each sampling station over time for several different chemicals and water properties.

Questions:

  • Characterize the past and most recent situation with respect to chemical contamination in the Boonsong Lekagul waterways. Do you see any trends of possible interest in this investigation?
  • What anomalies do you find in the waterway samples dataset? How do these affect your analysis of potential problems to the environment? Is the Hydrology Department collecting sufficient data to understand the comprehensive situation across the Preserve? What changes would you propose to make in the sampling approach to best understand the situation?
  • After reviewing the data, do any of your findings cause particular concern for the Pipit or other wildlife? Would you suggest any changes in the sampling strategy to better understand the waterways situation in the Preserve?