Difference between revisions of "Group12 Proposal"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Sameerp.2017 (talk | contribs) |
Sameerp.2017 (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
<!--MAIN HEADER --> | <!--MAIN HEADER --> | ||
| − | {|style="background-color:#0b3d53;" width=" | + | {|style="background-color:#0b3d53;" width="100%" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" valign="top" border="0" | |
| style="font-family:Century Gothic; font-size:125%; solid #1B338F; background:#0b3d53; text-align:center;" width="17%" | | | style="font-family:Century Gothic; font-size:125%; solid #1B338F; background:#0b3d53; text-align:center;" width="17%" | | ||
; | ; | ||
Revision as of 20:42, 15 June 2018
*Have the Nations really progressed ?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PROPOSAL
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contents
Abstract
Comparing data for nations.
Objectives
The main objectives of the project are listed as follows:
• Which nations and how they have progressed?
• Is that enough?
Data Source
• will include later
•
Data Description
Basically, the data
Visualization Tools
• R: shiny, shinydashboard, ggplot2, plotly.
• Tableau
Challenges
• Data has large volume and complex pattern, thus might be difficult to model.
• The combinations of indicators can yield numerous trading strategies. Finding an optimal mix of different strategies is more of an art than a science.
• The stock price is vulnerable to many factors, thus analysis based on historical data may not give an accurate prediction for the future return.
