Difference between revisions of "ISSS608 2018-19 T3 Assign SAMEER PANDA Introduction"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Sameerp.2017 (talk | contribs) |
Sameerp.2017 (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 47: | Line 47: | ||
| style="font-family:Verdana; font-size:100%; solid #1B338F; background:#0b3d53; text-align:center;" width="100%" | | | style="font-family:Verdana; font-size:100%; solid #1B338F; background:#0b3d53; text-align:center;" width="100%" | | ||
; | ; | ||
− | <font size = 3; font color="#FFFFFF"><span style="font-family:Verdana; font-size:100%; solid #1B338F; background:#0b3d53;"> Questions need Answers!</span></font> | + | <font size = 3; font color="#FFFFFF"><span style="font-family:Verdana; font-size:100%; solid #1B338F; background:#0b3d53;">Questions need Answers!</span></font> |
| | | | ||
|} | |} | ||
<font size = 3.5><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> | <font size = 3.5><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> | ||
− | With a primary piece of evidence against Kasios now gone, investigators will need to take another approach. Professors in the Mistford College Hydrology Department have come forward with several years of water sensor readings from rivers and streams in the preserve. These samples were taken from different locations scattered throughout the area and contain measurements of several chemicals of possible interest, but they have never been analyzed due to lack of funding. Could visual analytics help reveal something in this data that could make up for the soil evidence that was destroyed? | + | With a primary piece of evidence against Kasios now gone, investigators will need to take another approach. Professors in the Mistford College Hydrology Department have come forward with several years of water sensor readings from rivers and streams in the preserve. These samples were taken from different locations scattered throughout the area and contain measurements of several chemicals of possible interest, but they have never been analyzed due to lack of funding. Could visual analytics help reveal something in this data that could make up for the soil evidence that was destroyed?</span></font> |
+ | <br/> | ||
+ | <font size = 3.5><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> Q1 </span></font> | ||
+ | <br/> | ||
+ | * <font size = 3.5><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Characterize the past and most recent situation with respect to chemical contamination. </span></font> | ||
+ | * <font size = 3.5><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Do you see any trends of possible interest in this investigation? </span></font> | ||
+ | <font size = 3.5><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> Q2 </span></font> | ||
+ | <br/> | ||
+ | * <font size = 3.5><span style="font-family:Verdana;">What anomalies do you find in the waterway samples dataset? </span></font> | ||
+ | * <font size = 3.5><span style="font-family:Verdana;">How do these affect your analysis of potential problems to the environment?</span></font> | ||
+ | * <font size = 3.5><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Is the Hydrology Department collecting sufficient data to understand the comprehensive situation across the Preserve? </span></font> | ||
+ | * <font size = 3.5><span style="font-family:Verdana;">What changes would you propose to make in the sampling approach to best understand the situation?</span></font> | ||
+ | <font size = 3.5><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> Q3 </span></font> | ||
+ | <br/> | ||
+ | * <font size = 3.5><span style="font-family:Verdana;">After reviewing the data, do any of your findings cause particular concern for the Pipit or other wildlife? </span></font> | ||
+ | <br/> | ||
+ | {|style="background-color:#FDFEFE;" width="100%" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" valign="top" border="0" | | ||
+ | | style="font-family:Verdana; font-size:100%; solid #1B338F; background:#0b3d53; text-align:center;" width="100%" | | ||
+ | ; | ||
+ | <font size = 3; font color="#FFFFFF"><span style="font-family:Verdana; font-size:100%; solid #1B338F; background:#0b3d53;">Softwares used for Visualization</span></font> | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | |} | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
* <font size = 3.5><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Visualization | * <font size = 3.5><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Visualization | ||
**'''Tableau 2018.1.0''' | **'''Tableau 2018.1.0''' |
Latest revision as of 19:19, 8 July 2018
|
|
|
|
|
To Be a Visual Detective |
- Need to investigate the hydrology data from across the Preserve.
- Need to find patterns in contaminant readings.
- To create a theory based on facts and findings.
Questions need Answers! |
With a primary piece of evidence against Kasios now gone, investigators will need to take another approach. Professors in the Mistford College Hydrology Department have come forward with several years of water sensor readings from rivers and streams in the preserve. These samples were taken from different locations scattered throughout the area and contain measurements of several chemicals of possible interest, but they have never been analyzed due to lack of funding. Could visual analytics help reveal something in this data that could make up for the soil evidence that was destroyed?
Q1
- Characterize the past and most recent situation with respect to chemical contamination.
- Do you see any trends of possible interest in this investigation?
Q2
- What anomalies do you find in the waterway samples dataset?
- How do these affect your analysis of potential problems to the environment?
- Is the Hydrology Department collecting sufficient data to understand the comprehensive situation across the Preserve?
- What changes would you propose to make in the sampling approach to best understand the situation?
Q3
- After reviewing the data, do any of your findings cause particular concern for the Pipit or other wildlife?
Softwares used for Visualization |
- Visualization
- Tableau 2018.1.0
- Data Enhancements
- MS Office 365
- JMP Pro 13.2.1