Difference between revisions of "ISSS608 2017-18 T3 Assign Yeo Kaijun Findings"

From Visual Analytics and Applications
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 22: Line 22:
 
<font size = 3; color="#FFFFFF"><span style="font-family:Century Gothic;">Q1: Characterize the past and most recent situation with respect to chemical contamination in the Boonsong Lekagul waterways.</span></font>   
 
<font size = 3; color="#FFFFFF"><span style="font-family:Century Gothic;">Q1: Characterize the past and most recent situation with respect to chemical contamination in the Boonsong Lekagul waterways.</span></font>   
 
</div>
 
</div>
 
+
<span style="font-size:16px; font-weight:bold;">Comparison across time</span>
 
[[File:Value of Pollutant over time.png|thumb|Img 1: % yearly change of avg pollutant value]]
 
[[File:Value of Pollutant over time.png|thumb|Img 1: % yearly change of avg pollutant value]]
  

Revision as of 00:10, 8 July 2018

VAST Mini Challenge 2: Findings

Overview

Methodology

Findings

Conclusion



Q1: Characterize the past and most recent situation with respect to chemical contamination in the Boonsong Lekagul waterways.

Comparison across time

Img 1: % yearly change of avg pollutant value



As observed in Img 1, there appears to be no obvious trends in terms of % yearly change of pollutants value. There is no consistent increase or decrease over the years as observed from the mix of red and green cells across the years. However, it appears there to be sharp increase and decrease in terms of pollutant values as observed from the bright green or red respectively. Further analysis is done for each pollutant that has sharp changes in recent years to understand the location that has contributed to these changes. The below mentioned trends had been observed


1. Increase in Arsenic values over the years

Img 2: Value of Arsenic over time by location



As observed in Img 2, even though there had been sharp increases and decreases in arsenic level over the years, as shown by the dotted trend line, arsenic value had on average been increasing over years. Arsenic value in Tansanee had spiked considerably as its value increased from 2.26 ug/L in 2011 to 4.468 ug/L in 2015. Despite the sharp increase in arsenic level, it is important to note that arsenic values are still way below US National Recommended Water Quality Criteria for aquatic life ambient water quality criteria


2. Atrazine values had spiked during 2008 - 2010 for most water way sensor




Back to Assignments