Difference between revisions of "ISSS608 2017-18 T3 Assign Sudhir Panda conclusion"
Sudhirp.2015 (talk | contribs) (Created page with "<div style=background:#2B3856 border:#A3BFB1> 250px <font size = 6;text-align:center; color="#FFFFFF"> VAST Challenge 2018 </font> </div...") |
Sudhirp.2015 (talk | contribs) |
||
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
| style="font-family:Century Gothic; font-size:100%; solid #000000; background:#2B3856; text-align:center;" width="20%" | | | style="font-family:Century Gothic; font-size:100%; solid #000000; background:#2B3856; text-align:center;" width="20%" | | ||
; | ; | ||
− | [[ISSS608_2017- | + | [[ISSS608_2017-18_T3_Assign_Sudhir_Panda | <font color="#FFFFFF">Introduction</font>]] |
| style="font-family:Century Gothic; font-size:100%; solid #1B338F; background:#2B3856; text-align:center;" width="20%" | | | style="font-family:Century Gothic; font-size:100%; solid #1B338F; background:#2B3856; text-align:center;" width="20%" | | ||
Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
|} | |} | ||
+ | |||
+ | The final conclusion for the analysis is yes there have been a spike in certain contamination however without the missing data from 2009 to 2013, we will not be able to infer conclusively that the contaminants did cause the wildlife disappearance. Also there were no data points that showed the effect on the contamination towards the disappearance of the wildlife. there were no data point son the counts of wildlife spotted hence we cannot relate the two incidents. Having said that we can prove certain chemicals can be seen increasing. | ||
+ | |||
+ | https://public.tableau.com/views/Assignment_Q2_SudhirPanda_Final_Story/Story1 | ||
+ | |||
+ | https://public.tableau.com/views/Assignment_Q2_SudhirPanda_Final_Story2_DataAnamoly/Story2 | ||
+ | |||
+ | https://public.tableau.com/views/Assignment_Q2_SudhirPanda_Final_Story3_WildLifeConcern/Story3 |
Latest revision as of 14:05, 20 August 2018
|
|
|
|
|
|
The final conclusion for the analysis is yes there have been a spike in certain contamination however without the missing data from 2009 to 2013, we will not be able to infer conclusively that the contaminants did cause the wildlife disappearance. Also there were no data points that showed the effect on the contamination towards the disappearance of the wildlife. there were no data point son the counts of wildlife spotted hence we cannot relate the two incidents. Having said that we can prove certain chemicals can be seen increasing.
https://public.tableau.com/views/Assignment_Q2_SudhirPanda_Final_Story/Story1
https://public.tableau.com/views/Assignment_Q2_SudhirPanda_Final_Story2_DataAnamoly/Story2
https://public.tableau.com/views/Assignment_Q2_SudhirPanda_Final_Story3_WildLifeConcern/Story3