Difference between revisions of "Access-the-Excess Proposal"
| Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
|} | |} | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
| − | [[Image: descriptionphoto.png|center| | + | [[Image: descriptionphoto.png|center|1150px]] |
<br> | <br> | ||
<div style="background: #46566E; padding: 20px; line-height: 0.3em; text-indent: 16px;letter-spacing:0.1em;font-size:20px"><font color=#fbfcfd face="Arial Narrow">Project Key Challenges</font></div> | <div style="background: #46566E; padding: 20px; line-height: 0.3em; text-indent: 16px;letter-spacing:0.1em;font-size:20px"><font color=#fbfcfd face="Arial Narrow">Project Key Challenges</font></div> | ||
Revision as of 23:44, 3 March 2018
|
|
|
|
|
|
No. |
Key Challenges |
Description |
Solution |
|
1. |
Difficulties faced in finding readily available data |
There is no data available from data.gov on the locations of Western Fast Food Restaurants |
•Obtain the postal codes of the Western Fast Food Restaurants from Google Maps and list them down into the Excel file |
|
2. |
Unfamiliar with R Shiny |
The team is completely new to R programming language |
•Independent learning starting from Iteration 1.4, Week 5 |
|
3. |
Unfamiliarity with spatial analysis techniques and difficulties faced during application |
The team is completely new to Geospatial Analysis |
•Independent learning |
|
4. |
Differing interpretations of project requirements |
The team may have faced misunderstandings on the requirements of the project |
•Internal meetings |
|
No. |
Data |
Source |
Data Type/Method |
|
1. |
|||
|
2. |
|||
|
3. |
The team has conducted a literature review to help us understand our project better.
We appreciate your comments. Thanks for helping us improve!
|
No. |
Name |
Date |
Comments |
|
1. |
Insert Name |
Insert Date |
Insert Comment |
|
2. |
Insert Name |
Insert Date |
Insert Comment |
|
3. |
Insert Name |
Insert Date |
Insert Comment |
