Difference between revisions of "ISSS608 2016-17 T3 Assign ZHOU YUHUI Conclusion"

From Visual Analytics and Applications
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 28: Line 28:
 
|}
 
|}
 
<br/>
 
<br/>
 +
 +
==Question4==
 +
The top 3 suspicious patterns, as far as I am concerned, are:
 +
 +
<b>1. No.of Stops vs Overall time spent</b>
 +
 +
Those 3 Car-IDs that stayed in the park for extremely long are very suspicious. For other cars, their car-ID is generated whenever then enter the park at entrance gate. Yet these 3 Car-IDs have more than 2 records of entrance gates, which means their car-IDs are not per-trip generated. This is not reasonable.
 +
 +
<b>2. "Gate" Visitors at night</b>
 +
 +
Gate is gate type for rangers only. Any non-ranger car that accessed this gate type is considered suspicious. Especially when these records happen at late night, it is even worse.
 +
 +
<b>3. "ranger-stop" Visitors at night</b>
 +
 +
Ranger-stop is also for rangers only. Same reason as why Gate visitors at night are suspicious.

Revision as of 15:12, 17 July 2017

Qbird.jpg


VAST Challenge 2017:Mystery at the Wildlife Preserve

Background

Methodology & Data Preparation

Insights

Conclusion

 


Question4

The top 3 suspicious patterns, as far as I am concerned, are:

1. No.of Stops vs Overall time spent

Those 3 Car-IDs that stayed in the park for extremely long are very suspicious. For other cars, their car-ID is generated whenever then enter the park at entrance gate. Yet these 3 Car-IDs have more than 2 records of entrance gates, which means their car-IDs are not per-trip generated. This is not reasonable.

2. "Gate" Visitors at night

Gate is gate type for rangers only. Any non-ranger car that accessed this gate type is considered suspicious. Especially when these records happen at late night, it is even worse.

3. "ranger-stop" Visitors at night

Ranger-stop is also for rangers only. Same reason as why Gate visitors at night are suspicious.