ISSS608 2016-17 T1 Assign2 WEI Jingxian

From Visual Analytics and Applications
Revision as of 14:02, 26 September 2016 by Jingxianwei.2015 (talk | contribs)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Motivation and Problems

Wikipedia is commonly used in our study and research, but there must be something disappointed users. From Wikipedia aspect, it is essential to know about the attitudes of users, especially university faculty. Because most of university faculty use Wikipedia as an academic reference or a teaching resource and they have more knowledge on their domain, they would be a valuable source of feedback about how well Wikipedia done and what need to be improved in academic area.Based on the survey, Wikipedia can know the attitudes of faculty and improve its performance.
Basically, we would like to know what are the best items and what are the worst items. In addition, we want to explore different preference of faculty in different domain or positions.

  •  ??
1.
2.
3.
4.

Data Information

There is a survey on university faculty perceptions and practices of using Wikipedia as a teaching resource. There are totally 43 questions from 13 categories covered in the survey, and the response ranges from 1, which means strongly disagree to 5, which means strongly agree. The dataset can be download from following link. Wiki4HE Data Set
The following table shows the categories and corresponding questions of the survey

No. Survey Categories Corresponding Survey Questions
1 Perceived usefulness

PU1: The use of Wikipedia makes it easier for students to develop new skills 
PU2: The use of Wikipedia improves students' learning 
PU3: Wikipedia is useful for teaching

2 Perceived ease of use

PEU1: Wikipedia is user-friendly
PEU2: It is easy to find in Wikipedia the information you seek 
PEU3: It is easy to add or edit information in Wikipedia 

3 Perceived enjoyment

ENJ1: The use of Wikipedia stimulates curiosity 
ENJ2: The use of Wikipedia is entertaining 

4 Quality

QU1: Articles in Wikipedia are reliable 
QU2: Articles in Wikipedia are updated 
QU3: Articles in Wikipedia are comprehensive 
QU4: In my area of expertise, Wikipedia has a lower quality than other educational resources 
QU5: I trust in the editing system of Wikipedia 

5 Visibility

VIS1: Wikipedia improves visibility of students' work 
VIS2: It is easy to have a record of the contributions made in Wikipedia 

6 Social image

IM1: The use of Wikipedia is well considered among colleagues 
IM2: In academia, sharing open educational resources is appreciated 
IM3: My colleagues use Wikipedia 

7 Sharing attitude

SA1: It is important to share academic content in open platforms 
SA2: It is important to publish research results in other media than academic journals or books 
SA3: It is important that students become familiar with online collaborative environments 

8 Use behavior

USE1: I use Wikipedia to develop my teaching materials 
USE2: I use Wikipedia as a platform to develop educational activities with students 
USE3: I recommend my students to use Wikipedia 
USE4: I recommend my colleagues to use Wikipedia 
USE5: I agree my students use Wikipedia in my courses  

9 Profile 2.0

PF1: I contribute to blogs 
PF2: I actively participate in social networks 
PF3: I publish academic content in open platforms 

10 Job relevance

JR1: My university promotes the use of open collaborative environments in the Internet 
JR2: My university considers the use of open collaborative environments in the Internet as a teaching merit 

11 Behavioral intention

BI1: In the future I will recommend the use of Wikipedia to my colleagues and students 
BI2: In the future I will use Wikipedia in my teaching activity

12 Incentives

INC1: To design educational activities using Wikipedia, it would be helpful: a best practices guide 
INC2: To design educational activities using Wikipedia, it would be helpful: getting instruction from a colleague 
INC3: To design educational activities using Wikipedia, it would be helpful: getting specific training 
INC4: To design educational activities using Wikipedia, it would be helpful: greater institutional recognition 

13 Experience

EXP1: I consult Wikipedia for issues related to my field of expertise 
EXP2: I consult Wikipedia for other academic related issues
EXP3: I consult Wikipedia for personal issues 
EXP4: I contribute to Wikipedia (editions, revisions, articles improvement...) 
EXP5: I use wikis to work with my students  


Data Preparation

Replacement

First of all, it is necessary to check the missing data before we start analysing. There are many '?' excited in several columns, and JMP would treat these columns as character, which is inappropriate data type for answers. Thus, we need to replace all the '?' with null value and change the type of answers into numeric.

Replace.JPG

Calculation

In order to check the overall performance of each category, we calculate the averages of questions under each category, and use them to represent the responses of categories. The sample formula is shown in the screenshot below.

Formula.jpg

Format Conversion

Since we would like to discover both category level and question level, we imported the dataset after replacement and calculation twice and used them for different conversion.

Use Pivot function to convert the data in tableau

Create groups for age and years of university teaching experience (yearexp)

Exploration

Demographic Information

Demographic information

Conclusion