Difference between revisions of "ISSS608 2016-17 T1 Assign2 WEI Jingxian"

From Visual Analytics and Applications
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 10: Line 10:
 
:4.
 
:4.
  
== Approaches ==
+
== Data Information ==
===Data Preparation===
+
 
 +
 
 +
{| class="wikitable sortable"
 +
|-
 +
! No. !! Survey Items !! Corresponding Survey Questions
 +
|-
 +
| 1 || Perceived usefulness || PU1: The use of Wikipedia makes it easier for students to develop new skills 
 +
PU2: The use of Wikipedia improves students' learning 
 +
PU3: Wikipedia is useful for teaching ||
 +
|-
 +
| 2 || Perceived ease of use || PEU1: Wikipedia is user-friendly 
 +
PEU2: It is easy to find in Wikipedia the information you seek 
 +
PEU3: It is easy to add or edit information in Wikipedia  ||
 +
|-
 +
| 3 ||Perceived enjoyment || ENJ1: The use of Wikipedia stimulates curiosity 
 +
ENJ2: The use of Wikipedia is entertaining ||
 +
|-
 +
| 4 || Quality || QU1: Articles in Wikipedia are reliable 
 +
QU2: Articles in Wikipedia are updated 
 +
QU3: Articles in Wikipedia are comprehensive 
 +
QU4: In my area of expertise, Wikipedia has a lower quality than other educational resources 
 +
QU5: I trust in the editing system of Wikipedia  ||
 +
==Data Preparation==
  
  
 
== Conclusion ==
 
== Conclusion ==

Revision as of 10:21, 26 September 2016

Abstract

Problem and Motivation

  •  ??
1.
2.
3.
4.

Data Information

No. Survey Items Corresponding Survey Questions
1 Perceived usefulness PU1: The use of Wikipedia makes it easier for students to develop new skills 

PU2: The use of Wikipedia improves students' learning  PU3: Wikipedia is useful for teaching ||

2 Perceived ease of use PEU1: Wikipedia is user-friendly 

PEU2: It is easy to find in Wikipedia the information you seek  PEU3: It is easy to add or edit information in Wikipedia  ||

3 Perceived enjoyment ENJ1: The use of Wikipedia stimulates curiosity 

ENJ2: The use of Wikipedia is entertaining ||

4 Quality QU1: Articles in Wikipedia are reliable 

QU2: Articles in Wikipedia are updated  QU3: Articles in Wikipedia are comprehensive  QU4: In my area of expertise, Wikipedia has a lower quality than other educational resources  QU5: I trust in the editing system of Wikipedia  ||

Data Preparation

Conclusion